Planning Conditions for Australian Mosques:
There be no preaching of or display or provision of written material or literature or, audio, or video materials that encourages or promotes or praises:
violent acts of jihad.
engagement in terrorist activity.
the provision of financial support to jihadists
the establishment of a caliphate in Australia
acts of terror against the West
symbols or role models of violent jihad;
the use of force, terror, war, or violence to implement the Sharia;
the inferiority of non-Muslim life
hatred or intolerance toward non-Muslims or notional Muslims
inflammatory materials with anti-Australian views
The Koran does not say fight until Islam is the ruling power in every country in the world except Australia.
The issues of power, economic and temporal power is built in to the idea of Mosques. Two Thirds of the Koran talks about dominating un-believers.
Mohammed's first mosque was his centre of power to create totalitarianism. New Mosques replicate its political and military purposes. Declaring Jihad, sending out armies. Imposing Sharia, declaring the inferiority of the unbeliever, pronouncing death sentences and violent acts of jihad. engagement in terrorist activity. the provision of financial support to jihadists, the establishment of a caliphate, acts of terror against the West. symbols or role models of violent jihad; the use of force, terror, war, or violence to implement the Sharia; the inferiority of non-Muslim life, hatred or intolerance toward non-Muslims or notional Muslims.
Mohammed is the perfect example for all people for all time. Each Mosque all over the world mimics the first mosque in Medina. What goes on inside almost always does as well.
Recent detailed US studies, including some undercover work produced categories of: Violent Mosques – (51%) those with DVD’s and books exhorting flying planes into buildings and jihadi killings, pictures of Islamic soldiers marching along with Kalashnikov rifles. All of these had leaders that were preaching the raising of money to fund terrorist organisations, Moderately violent Mosques (30%) – those who promote devout Islam and strong conversion of infidels, with material that tends to pre-date 9-11. 97% of these also had leaders that were preaching and raising money to fund terrorist organisations. And only 19% were non-violent.
Three quarters of all attendees went to the 51% of mosques in the violent category.
In the USA, only 1 in 30 of all mosque attendees go to a non-violent mosque.
Another study backed up this concluding that 80% of mosques contain material that actively supports and promotes Jihadi violence.
Islamic doctrine is contrary to the Law in a free society.
The Koran calls 3 times for unbelievers to be killed, wherever they are found.
14 times for unbelievers to be enslaved – sex slaves to be taken in conquest.
Hatred harshness and war against unbelievers innumerable times – more than a hundred times. Chopping off heads, chopping off fingers, chopping off limbs.
This sort of incitement is contrary to Australian Law. It is a crime. It is not permitted. If it was said about Aborigines the offender would be locked up or prosecuted as Andrew Bolt was for less.
The public propagation of Islamic doctrine is contrary to Australian Criminal and Civil Law
No other organisation would be permitted to promote such hatred. No one else can promote the killing of Jews and Gays.
The Common Law, Public Order and Public Peace is the foundation of Australian Law.
Here we are Free.
Because we are allowing the freedom to promulgate Islamic doctrine here we are losing the ability to preserve our own freedoms. By allowing this disguised as religion we undermine our own civil legal order.
If the public propagation of Islamic doctrine is contrary to Australian Criminal and Civil Law then it is also a crime to aid and abet, which is what councillors do when they vote to allow a mosque because they know that a mosque is going to be used for: the propogation of Islamic doctrine..
That means they have may have no power to grant permission for a Mosque. If they have no power then the individual councillors may be sued, not the Council.
Imagine Little old lady in poor area gets forced out of her home. Has to sell up for a pittance. Maybe she can sue one of the Councillors who voted for the planning approval for the Mosque which Islamised the area which forced her out. The prospect for that Councillor is that he may be subject to repeated costly claims.
Mosques act as a bridgehead for Sharia. Say with a straight face “I would love a Mosque to be next to my place”
Poorer or walking class areas are chosen and three stages follow. Parking in front of drives or on private land and general annoyance. The dominant stage – don’t tell us what to do. And the get out of our area stage, we want to buy your house – cheap. Then vandalisation occurs until the target leaves and the authorities can do nothing.
If it is the case that any new Mosque is for peaceful prayer only then they should have no problem with agreeing to these planning conditions by consent.