Ordinary Concerns are being de legitimised by political elites who are substantially left leaning.
Ordinary Australians Concerns are being let down and aggressively attacked by the media.
Australian Culture faces a challenge to its very existence.
I say that we, those in the broad based anti-islam movement, have already changed the political dialogue in Australia.
We have not yet converted opponents who want to respect everything no matter how stupid or obnoxious or undeserving of respect some inhumane practises and beliefs may be.
Political rallies, such as Pegida, Stand up and Re-Claim are elaborate theatre, performance art designed to get media attention and just as importantly media attendance.
Much of the work that I have done, we have done, – speaking face to face with individual reporters – persuading and convincing them that there are real issues and the substance of them – has been possible only because of the theatrical demonstration or rally on the day.
These rallies were not advancing an agenda that the socialist media wants to hear or publicise, precisely the opposite.
I have been to rallies that started out most disappointingly for the press. They are peaceful, some good natured chanting and some speakers addressing the issues. The first Rally in Adelaide was so peaceful that the news media actually spliced in some ruckus from other States.
Until the modern fascists who ironically call themselves anti-fascists, turn up bringing their history of violence which requires Police, and Police Horses, and the fascist calls to shut down free speech under threat of such violence.
Then the media go in to a frenzy , lots of noise, lots of police, the hope of violence and it is almost always the fascist left that gets themselves arrested for attacking police horses and the police.
All makes for great television but loses the message – and that is the purpose of the fascists –
I have been speaking against Sharia and domestic violence – when a sign is facing me saying - sexist mysognist.
I have been speaking in favour of the 80% Aussie Muslims who just want to raise their families and see a sign saying “Islamophobe”
And I have been speaking against throwing homosexuals to their death by Islamists and I get a sign in my face saying “Homophobe.”
These are the signs that make the background footage on the news. But represent the exact opposite of why I am saying.
The average watcher of the news understands little or nothing of this.
But that is where the social theory cuts in.
First consider the idea of the “Qualified Target.” This is a concept that comes from the door-to-door vacuum cleaner sales industry.
The theory goes that a door-to-door vacuum cleaner salesman needs to be able to instantly assess the person who answers the door and determine
1/ if they are a vacuum cleaner user and therefore someone who might buy one, and
2/ if they have the cash to purchase a vacuum cleaner.
On the basis of those two answers the salesman can decide whether the person is a “qualified target”, whether the person is worth his time and effort pitching his product to, or if he would be better off trying next door.
Those people who have to ask whether the pro Australia rallies was a success are not really the “qualified targets.”
There are three “qualified targets” for a Pegida or Reclaim or Stand up rally,
They may not necessarily buy the message, but are well worth aiming at.
The lowest priority is the Islamic community. They will see the news footage and will instantly “get”
the message, that there is in fact resistance out there to their Islamification agenda.
The “moderates” may be made to feel uncomfortable and uneasy, but possibly no more uncomfortable or uneasy than many non-Muslims are now made to feel in the presence of Muslims.
Specially in the enclaves in Australia which are the pre-cursors of the hundreds and hundreds of European Islamic Ghettos in Belgium. Germany, France, Sweden, England.
More conservative and extremist Muslims may be made to feel angry, and demonstrate their anger,
but this only re-states Lakemban Islam for what it is and places that violent reality back in the media spotlight instead of allowing it to slide off the front pages as of no risk to Australia. as much of the media and appeasing apologist politicians would like.
The second group of “qualified targets” are the left, progressive, regressive elites in politics and the media.
These people are desperate to control the Islamic immigration debate and are incensed when anyone has the audacity to question their policies.
Because they have no arguments. No actual reasons . No actual basis for their policies.
They are not able to express their policies in any rational terms, they are forced to use abuse
They use attack words ; “Islamophobia”, “racists”, “ xenophobic.” they use meaningless abusive phrases such as “Resisting Islam is an embarrassment to the nation”, … They say.
The more abuse they use, the more pro- Australia rallies can be sure that they are doing well.
All publicity is good publicity. They are not allowing the debate to slide off the front pages, as the socialist apologist islamophilic media and the Dhimmi politicians would like.
The publicity emphasises the fact that the left are not controlling the debate as firmly as they would like.
The third target group, and the most important group of “qualified targets”, are the average Australians who are very concerned about the Islamification of Australia,
They have seen and heard enough of what is happening in Europe (and Martin’s Place, Lakemba and Parramatta), but
But they are fearful and afraid, frightened into silence by the open threats of violence by Islamists,
and by the campaign of passive and often aggressive violence against them from the media and the self righteous political elites.
These people watch the TV News showing the scuffles between the police and, the Socialist fascists anti anti demonstrators, and it heartens them into feeling that there are people out there who do understand their concerns, and who are not so frightened that they will stand by That there are people who will stand up for them and allow their concerns to be voiced and expressed in a very public way.
Which brings me to the second part of social theory – “Social Licence”
At a pedestrian crossing. Everyone stands there and waits for the green “WALK” sign even when there is no one else around.
If only one, or perhaps two people cross on red, then there is disapproval,
but there is a point at which a number of people cross.
This is the point which gives social licence for everyone to cross even against the red don’t walk sign.
Middle Australians, watching the News, see the Pro Australian rally people standing out as opponents against the Government approved policy of virtually unlimited immigration, specially from dangerous areas of the world which have been forced on them,
and so they begin to feel the social licence to do the same. To stand out.
They begin to feel ok thinking what they in fact already thought.
They may have only held these opinions in private, but importantly, they feel licence to think it.
One thing with “social licence” is that the licence to think an opinion will often break out in small acts of defiance.
People will say that they now eat more pork and bacon than they used to, or have stopped buying halal certified food, or they wear a hat with an Australian flag on it,
just as little acts of resistance.
Small but important. Because the other thing about “social licence” is that once people feel they have been licenced to commit small acts, they find it harder to justify not doing more.
They are more likely to start reading more widely, to more openly speak and offer an opinion,
and more likely to investigate political alternatives.
Having had their concerns de legitimised by their political elites who are substantially left leaning.
and being let down or attacked by the media in such an aggressive manner,
They are then being re-licenced and re-legitimised by protest groups,
And this pushes them, moves them, these ordinary Australians further to the more conservative Right.
Two recent opinion polls one on News.com.au and one in held by Newspoll suggest that media and
the political elites have lost control of the debate,
that neither political party could be said to represent the concerns of these ordinary people.
Some politicians understand this.
Aiming to “qualified targets” knowing that the unqualified targets will never understand the message,
Knowing that backlash strengthens the message to qualified targets.
This licences large sections of the population to stand outside the political appeasement, respect everything no matter how bad it is, system and
Instead speak out about their actual and real concerns.
So, I say to you. .
Feel the social license and resist what you know is wrong.
Your actions will licence others to resist also