The author, Laurie Penny, simply cannot accept that Islam is incompatible with sexual equality.
She wants both and she cannot have them without mental gymnastic to hide her sense of guilt.
Laurie Penny says of Cologne:
My commentary in italics John Bolton 11th January 2016
After Cologne, we can't let the bigots steal feminism
- Why can't we always take sexual assault as seriously as we do when migrants and Muslims are involved as perpetrators?
I deny that sexual assault is not taken as seriously when non-migrants and Muslims are not the perpetrators. I say the opposite is true. Islamists are constantly given different media treatment when they sexually assault women and girls under their god given right to “go and plough” women as directed in the Koran.
- In a perverse sort of way, it's progress. After months of dog-whistle xenophobia, European authorities have finally started to treat migrants as they would treat any other citizen. They have achieved this by choosing not to make a fuss when migrants are accused of raping and assaulting women.
I take this to be satirical. She cannot be condoning the authorities and media failing to report accurately that 400 (so far) were attacked in a co-ordinated Islamic Immigrant Jihad on European Women.
- On New Year's Eve in Cologne, Germany, hundreds of men, almost all of reportedly 'Arabic and North African' appearance and including many asylum seekers, viciously attacked women who were celebrating in the central plaza, robbing and groping and tearing off clothes. At least one rape complaint has been filed. The police and the press were initially slow to react, and the Mayor of Cologne reacted to eventual protests by suggesting that women should adopt a code of conduct in public and keep an ‘arm’s length’ distance between themselves and strange men.
- This is not the first time a European city administration has responded to an outbreak of sexual violence by blaming the women. It is the first time in recent history that the right-wing press has not joined in the condemnation of these wanton strumpets who dare to think they might be able to have a good time without worrying what ‘invitation’ they’re sending to men. I cannot recall any press in the western world, in the last 20 years at least, condemning women in this manner except when they are reporting what Islamic “scholars” have said about women in bikinis being like uncovered meat which inflames islamic men to the point that the woman is to blame for the rape. Instead, the right wing blames… liberals. Who apparently caused all this by daring to suggest that refugees should be able to come to Europe in safety. Herein lies a major part of the author’s fear. She, like Chancellor Merkel, must now be feeling guilt ridden for promoting and supporting such a huge influx of unpolicable young Muslim men who have been brought up to believe that non-muslim women are not worthy of any respect. Those who complained and warned about this have never said immigration and asylum was not appropriate in proper circumstances. The Eurozone has good policy. Stop at the first country. Become registered and processed. They do not support mass colonisation to the country with the best social security.
- It'd be great if we could take rape, sexual assault and structural misogyny as seriously every day as we do when migrants and Muslims are involved as perpetrators.The attacks in Cologne were horrific. The responses - both by officials and by the armies of Islamophobes and xenophobes who have jumped at the chance to condemn Muslim and migrant men as savages - have also been horrific. Cologne has already seen violent protests by the far-right anti-migrant organisation Pegida, a group not previously noted for its dedication to progressive feminism. Angela Merkel has responded by tightening the rules for asylum seekers, but for many commentators, it’s not enough.What is it that has been horrific about the German people, women and men, demonstrating that they want their government to control mass organised attacks on women? Merkel has demonstrably done nothing except make an announcement.
- It’s a miracle! Finally, the right wing cares about rape culture! Finally, all over the world, from Fox News to 4chan, a great conversion has taken place and men who previously spent their time shaming, stalking and harassing women are suddenly concerned about our rights! And all it took was a good excuse to bash migrants and Muslims and tell feminists they don’t know what’s good for them. This is just an unsubstantiated misanthropic raving tirade. How dare the author say those who stand up against this organised islamic violent robbery and sexual abuse all have a history of misogyny.
- You know what has never yet prevented sexual violence? Unbridled racism. I do wonder how many times it has to be pointed out that criticism of the totalitarian ideology that is Islam has nothing to do with race, - nor with Muslims who moderately go about their business abiding by the laws of the country that they live in.
- This theft of feminist rhetoric in the name of imperialism and racism has been going on for centuries. It’s been an active part of the political conversation in the West since 2001. In the week since the Cologne attacks have been reported in the global press, a great many men have taken it upon themselves to educate me and other feminists on the point that only Muslim men are sexist. They have chosen to do this by sending orchestrated waves of abuse and sexual slurs to any woman whose opinion they dislike. Nobody has to pass a self-awareness test to go on Twitter. Theft of feminist rhetoric? A claim to possess the right to argue against misogyny? Really? I accept, that she and other women have been abused and slurred but I wonder at what level criticism of opinion becomes abuse. “Hate speech” seems these days to refer to anyone ”progressives” disagree with.
- Personally, I just love it when random men on the internet tell me what my feminism should like, because gosh, you know, this whole resisting oppression thing is really hard sometimes and it’s great to have people who know what they’re talking about take over for me so I can get on with the ironing. Another claim to possession of rhetoric? These people have repeatedly demanded that I ‘condemn’ the attacks in Cologne, which is a lazy way of implying that somebody doesn't really care about an issue. I would suggest that it is more an implication that failing to condemn the said attacks is due to a conflict that you have between standing up for women or standing up for the new class of Islamic Perpetrators of offences against women.
- So let me be clear: sexual violence is never, ever acceptable. Not for cultural reasons. Not for religious reasons. Not because the perpetrators are really angry and disenfranchised. There can be no quarter for systemic misogyny. And if we’re serious about that, there’s not a country or culture on earth that won’t have to take a long, hard look at itself. Hold on here a moment. Let’s stop and consider this. She is now comparing Islamic Ideology where the sharia law supports the stoning of women rape victims who cannot produce four male witnesses and therefore finds herself condemned for adultery with the modern western world which has strongly enforced laws against such things. I stand with the many, many Muslim, Arab, Asian and immigrant feminists organising against sexism and misogyny within and beyond their own communities. Nobody seems to have thought to ask them how best to deal with systemic sexual violence - even though attacks on Muslim women have increased since the terrorist attacks in Paris last year.
- The sensible thing to do in response to the Cologne attacks would be to call, as many German feminists are doing, for a far more rigorous attitude to rape and sexual assault across Europe. Instead, the solution on the table seems to be to clamp down on migration. These two approaches are not mutually exclusive remedies. I do ask, in what way the ordinary laws of Europe can be improved to condemn and police the crime of rape.”That fits in with the shibboleth that only savage, foreign men and hardened criminals rape and abuse women - despite the fact that most rapes, in Germany and elsewhere, are committed by people known to the victim, and migrants have not been shown to be more or less sexually aggressive than any other group. As usual, white supremacist patriarchy only concerns itself with women’s safety and women’s dignity when rape and sexual assault can be pinned on cultural ‘outsiders’. This is just not true. Sex crimes in heavily islamised areas of Europe have gone through the roof soaring by 500% over non-islamised areas.
- Saying ‘sexism is also part of Western culture’ does not mean that the experience of women in the West is exactly the same as the experience of women in Middle Eastern dictatorships and war zones. Do you know why that is? Can you guess? It’s because the world is not divided into ‘things that are exactly the same as each other’ and ‘things that are total opposites.’ And yet as a woman she claims a right to exclusively possess and argue feminist rhetoric, men are, according to her, unable to understand or assist.
- I actually can’t believe I’m having to explain this right now. I thought we covered this in kindergarten. Those of us who have moved beyond that level can, if we really try hard, understand that it’s not either ‘sexism is exclusively practised by Muslim men’ and ‘sexism is exactly the same everywhere.’ This is what we call a ‘false dichotomy’ when we get to big-kid school. Now we have a claim to intellectual superiority. Those who may disagree with her do so because they are uneducated beyond kindergarten or simply are not as clever . An appeal to “I know better than you” is not an argument.
- The oppression of women is a global phenomenon because patriarchy is a global phenomenon. It’s embedded in the economic and social structures of almost every nation and community on earth. Sexism and misogyny, however, look different across boundaries of culture and religion, as well as across divides of race and class and between generations. I agree This is not a complicated thing to understand. I’m really trying not to be patronising. But a lot of people are behaving like vicious children over this issue, so if you’re not one of them, I hope you understand why right now I wish I could put half the Internet on time out in a nice safe room where they can scream and break things without hurting themselves or anyone else. I agree, but I may disagree about who should be in time out.
- And there’s something else I’ve noticed, too.
- For all that these people claim to hate 'Islamic' sexual violence, it seems to fascinate them. In the past three years, I’ve lost count of the white men - and it is almost always white men- who have emailed, tweeted and sent me doctored pictures sharing their graphic fantasies in which feminist harpies like me are stoned to death, fucked to death, genitally mutilated, whipped, burned and gang-raped - not by them of course. By those awful Muslims. There seems to be an almost erotic fascination with the rhetoric of sexual violence these men associate with Muslims - it's so awful that they have to concentrate really hard on the details and maybe save some screenshots to contemplate later in private. This could be an interesting area for better analysis. I am less likely than the author to jump to the conclusion that there is any erotic fantasy. With the same amount of evidence as her (Nil) I am more inclined to think that they are trying to convey the atrocious way that women are routinely treated by Islamists.
- I’ll be blunt. I think some people out there are very excited by their conception of ‘Islamic’ violence against women. Quite possibly true – although there is not a jot of evidence for this proposition It allows them to enjoy the spectacle of women being brutalised and savaged whilst convincing themselves that it’s only foreign, savage men who do these things. Whilst it may not be true that it is only foreign savage men who savage women. It is certainly true that Islamists do, and they take their practises wherever they go and they certainly commit these crimes in fantastically disproportionate numbers. If hearing that makes you angry, if it makes you want to smash my bitch face in and tell me I’m a whore who deserves to be raped to death by ISIS, then congratulations, you’ve just proved my point. .
- The point is that misogyny knows no colour or creed, and perhaps it’s time we did something about that. Does the author not see that is exactly what those who argue against Islamic doctrinal misogyny are doing? We’re used to a society where a basic level of everyday sexism, sexual violence and assault is accepted. So if you're saying this act of violence isn’t entirely different from all of those, and if you’re saying that refugees should be treated the same as European citizens, you must be saying that everyone should get a free pass to treat women like walking meatbags, right? Wrong. The author is failing to distinguish between contemporary Islamist doctrinely endorsed endemic misogyny and aberrant behaviour punishable by law in a modern western democracy. I may agree that the misogyny is not different in kind. But it is manifestly and overwhelmingly different in quantum and social and legal strictures and consequences.
- Wrong. It’s time to take rape, sexual assault and structural misogyny as seriously every day as we do when migrants and Muslims are involved as perpetrators. That means that, yes, refugees must learn to respect women as human beings. Citizens, too, must learn to respect women’s agency and autonomy. Men and boys of every faith and none must learn that they are neither entitled to women’s bodies nor owed to our energy and attention, that it is not okay, ever, to rape, to assault, to abuse and attack women, not even if your ideology says it’s okay. That goes for the men’s rights activists, the anti-feminists and fanatical right-wingers much as it does for religious bigots. Agreed but see comments on 18 above.
- If we want to hold up Europe as a beacon of women’s rights, that’s fantastic. Let’s make it happen. Agreed If we’re suddenly a continent with a zero-tolerance policy on sexual violence and ritualised misogyny, let’s seize that energy. Let’s see real investment by the state and individuals in holding aggressors to account and supporting victims. It’s easier to pin misogyny on cultural outsiders than it is to accept that men everywhere must do better - but any other attitude is rank hypocrisy.
There is nothing sudden about a zero-tolerance policy on sexual violence. It is a crime. There are serious resources set up to police it. No zero tolerance policy wipes out the crime, ever. Prohibition on Liquor for instance.
It is completely false to argue that the problem with Islamic Immigration and the idealising of rape by Islamists on non-islamic women is the same problem as unlawful rape in a non-islamic democracy and can therefore be dealt with in the same way.
The author is grasping at straws to hold on to failed dogma.
She simply cannot accept that Islam is incompatible with sexual equality.
She wants both and she cannot have them without mental gymnastic to hide her sense of guilt.
It is her, and people like her, that have brought the problem on.
Laurie Penny is a contributing editor to the New Statesman. She is the author of five books, most recently Unspeakable Things.